Capital markets

Investment managers, acting on behalf of their retail and institutional clients, are among the largest investors in financial markets. They represent a key component of the market’s “buy-side” segment.

In representing the interests of its members on wholesale capital market issues, EFAMA advocates for fair, deep, liquid, and transparent capital markets, supported by properly regulated and supervised market infrastructure.

Related policy positions

Topic

year

Keywords

Policy Position

Capital Markets

CSDR

12 March 2021

Joint trade association letter regarding Implementation of CSDR SDR

On 11 March 2021, EFAMA and 14 trade associations representing a wide range of stakeholders in the European and global financial markets wrote to the European Commission and ESMA raising concerns about the implementation of the mandatory buy-in requirement under the EU’s CSDR Settlement Discipline Regime.

Policy position

EFAMA reply to ESMA CP on marketing communications guidelines

Capital Markets

MIFID

MiFID/MiFIR

EU Fund regulation

UCITS

Management Companies

AIFMD

09 February 2021

EFAMA reply to ESMA CP on marketing communications guidelines

EFAMA believes that ESMA’s draft ‘marketing communication’ Guidelines still require important clarifications to ensure full alignment between them and MiFID II’s Commission Delegated Regulation Article 44. This alignment is essential to ensure coherent rules for fund management companies and distributors. Unfortunately, parts of the proposed Guidelines are overly prescriptive and may unintentionally make some marketing materials vaguer or even inconsistent with local MiFID requirements for distributors.

Policy position

Capital Markets

CSDR

02 February 2021

EFAMA's reply to EC's consultation on the Review of CSDR

EFAMA supports the main objectives of CSDR to increase the safety and efficiency of securities settlement, including:

- Shorter settlement periods,
- Prudential and supervisory requirements for CSDs and other institutions providing banking services ancillary to securities settlement,
- The imposition of a penalty regime under CSDR as an important step towards improving settlement efficiency in European capital markets.

Statement on the release of the Oliver Wyman study ‘Caught on Tape’

“Oliver Wyman’s study ‘Caught on Tape’ provides a perplexing take on Consolidated Tape for Europe. Sure enough, it starts with accurate observations: the high number of trading venues in Europe, the resultant fragmented liquidity, unseen liquidity due to the lack of a consolidated tape, and the fact that leading markets like the US and Canada today benefit from a real time consolidated tape.

Infographic

Capital Markets

EMIR

MIFID

Data

MiFID/MiFIR

06 October 2021

Visual | Why do we need a real-time Consolidated Tape in the EU?

The current lack of quality pre- and post-trade data and the fragmentation of data sources remain an obstacle to the completion of the Capital Markets Union. The benefits of a real-time Consolidated Tape are wide-ranging: from market surveillance for supervisors, to best execution and an improved view on trading opportunities for retail investors, to portfolio management and pre- and post-trade analysis for fund managers to name a few.

Policy Position

Capital Markets

EMIR

16 September 2021

UK clearing house equivalence - request from nine trade associations

Nine associations (AFME, AIMA, EAPB, EBF, EFAMA, FIA, ICI, ISDA, SIFMA AMG) welcome the Commission's decision to grant a time-limited equivalence decision in respect of UK CCPs. However, when this time-limited equivalence decision expires on 30 June 2022, there remains a significant risk of disruption to clearing for EU firms and to their access to global markets.