UCITS
UCITS (Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities) refers to the EU framework for harmonising the creation, management and marketing of collective investment schemes in the EU (and EEA) Member States. It places a strong focus on investors’ protection and product regulation. Owing to this harmonised framework, once UCITS funds are registered in one Member State, they can be freely marketed across the European Union. Initially adopted in 1985, the UCITS Directive has since been modified repeatedly, to take into account developments in financial markets.
EFAMA is adamant to protect the competitiveness and international appeal of UCITS.
EFAMA position paper on the Market Integration and Supervision Package
ESMA's call for Evidence on the Eligible Assets Directive
ESMA’s Call for Evidence on the UCITS Eligible Assets Directive is a welcome opportunity to take stock of the existing UCITS framework.
High-level response to ESMA consultation on notifications for cross-border marketing and management of AIFs and UCITS
EFAMA welcomes the European Securities and Market Authority’s continuous commitment to creating a single market for investment funds, confirmed by the draft regulatory standards currently under consideration. These RTS/ITS would further harmonise information that asset managers should provide to their national competent authorities before marketing or managing an investment fund on a cross-border basis, thus facilitating intra-EU product distribution.
ETF inflows on track for new record in 2025
Today, EFAMA has published its latest Monthly Statistical Release for September 2025.
Strong net inflows into long-term UCITS continue in August
Today, EFAMA has published its latest Monthly Statistical Release for August 2025.
Net Returns and Fund Costs: A Nuanced Look at Value in UCITS
This article was published in the 23rd edition of the Fact Book on 24 June 2025.
Given the emphasis on costs and value for money for European investors, we have examined whether lower fees consistently translate into better net performance. Our analysis shows that this is not always the case; less-expensive funds do not necessarily deliver the highest returns, and in some instances, higher-cost funds outperform.