Supervision
While tighter regulation following the 2008 financial crisis helped bridge prior regulatory gaps, it also led to regulatory fragmentation across jurisdictions. Despite international coordination, different jurisdictions inevitably adopted different regulatory approaches and rules. The European Union is no exception; rules are not always interpreted or implemented consistently across the Union.
EFAMA participates in the effort to address this regulatory fragmentation. It does so by promoting effective and consistent supervision across Member States, by defending the industry’s delegation model, and by advocating for deference between jurisdictions. EFAMA also monitors 3rd-country developments, to ensure that such developments do not negatively impact the European asset management industry. These initiatives have concrete impact on increasing product choice and decreasing costs, which benefits end investors.
European asset managers maintain their opposition to centralised supervision
Supervisory colleges risk adding complexity without significant improvements
The ECB needs to better understand the ABCs of asset management
This article was first published on the EFAMA blog.
European Commission’s ambitious market integration package addresses many barriers to the Savings & Investment Union
EFAMA supports the majority of measures but warns against new ESMA supervisory reviews for large asset managers