Capital markets

Investment managers, acting on behalf of their retail and institutional clients, are among the largest investors in financial markets. They represent a key component of the market’s “buy-side” segment.

In representing the interests of its members on wholesale capital market issues, EFAMA advocates for fair, deep, liquid, and transparent capital markets, supported by properly regulated and supervised market infrastructure.

Related policy positions

Topic

year

Keywords

Policy position

EFAMA's reply to ESMA's CP on MiFIR Review report on the obligations to report transactions & reference data

Capital Markets

Distribution ＆ Client Disclosures

EU Fund regulation

UCITS

23 November 2020

EFAMA's reply to ESMA's CP on MiFIR Review report on the obligations to report transactions & reference data

We disagree with an extension of its scope to UCITS’ and AIFs’ management companies to the scope of the reporting requirements imposed by MiFIR, Art. 26. This extension would be in breach of the principle of proportionality, as:

Policy position

EFAMA’s position on EC proposal to modify Investment Research

Capital Markets

14 September 2020

EFAMA comments EC CP on a Covid-19 Capital Markets Recovery Package

EFAMA appreciates the Commission's efforts in pursuing an alleviation of certain MiFID II requirements in the interest of promoting a swift recovery from the economic crisis precipitated by the Covid-19 pandemic (....).

EFAMA believes however that there are more effective ways to foster SME access to markets and urges the Commission to consider a set of further measures (...)

Policy position

EFAMA's response to ESMA's Call for evidence on the availability and use of credit rating information & data

Capital Markets

03 August 2020

EFAMA's response to ESMA's Call for evidence on the availability and use of credit rating information & data

UK clearing house equivalence - request from nine trade associations

Nine associations (AFME, AIMA, EAPB, EBF, EFAMA, FIA, ICI, ISDA, SIFMA AMG) welcome the Commission's decision to grant a time-limited equivalence decision in respect of UK CCPs. However, when this time-limited equivalence decision expires on 30 June 2022, there remains a significant risk of disruption to clearing for EU firms and to their access to global markets.

Policy Position

Capital Markets

CSDR

15 July 2021

Joint association letter on the CSDR Settlement Discipline implementation timeline

On 14 July 2021, sixteen trade associations, representing buy-side, sell-side and market infrastructures, wrote to ESMA and the European Commission regarding the timeline for implementation of the mandatory buy-in rules as part of the CSDR Settlement Discipline Regime.

The Joint Associations welcome the Report from the Commission on the CSDR Review published in July 2021 and fully support the Commission’s intention to consider amendments to the mandatory buy-in regime, subject to an impact assessment.

Policy Position

Capital Markets

MIFID

07 July 2021

Ensuring a market structure and a transparency regime which facilitate liquidity, investors’ choice, and funding of companies | Joint statement

Well-functioning and liquid capital markets are fostered by an efficient market structure and supporting legislative frameworks. A diverse and efficient market structure reduces the costs of trading whilst promoting best execution. This optimises funding opportunities for issuers and maximises returns for investors and savers.